Latest Movie :
Recent Movies
Showing posts with label War On Terror. Show all posts
Showing posts with label War On Terror. Show all posts

Tuesday Truth .... Iraq 10 Years On......

Ten years on, ten Iraq war numbers that say it all

saddam statue topples
The downfall. Image: AP
TODAY marks 10 years since the start of the Iraq War, which officially ended in 2011. Here are 10 numbers to help put the war in perspective. 

0
The number of Weapons of Mass Destruction found. After the 9/11 attacks in 2001, then US president George W Bush, supported by British PM Tony Blair and Australia's John Howard, argued that Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein had to be removed to stop him providing weapons of mass destruction to terrorist groups.

0.5 (half)
That's the number of Iraqi doctors who remain in the country after virtually half the country's doctors left in the last decade to seek a better, safer life elsewhere.

Iraqi boy
Too many victims suffer alone. Image: AP

1
The number of McDonald's restaurants in Iraq. The one in Baghdad exists purely for the remaining fragments of the US army who are over there in various post-war roles. But don't assume American culture totally failed to gain a foothold. There is a restaurant in northern Iraq called MaDonal which serves "Big Macks".
 
44
The average daily summer temperature, in degrees Celsius, of Baghdad in summer. Troops reported unbearable heat while fighting in full combat gear.

4,777
The widely accepted total of coalition casualties in Iraq. At least 4,400 of these were American. Australia lost two soldiers, David Nary and Jake Kovco, both of whom died in accidents rather than combat. It is also worth mentioning that over 3,000 US contractors died in Iraq.

57,889
The number of Iraqis granted humanitarian visas in Australia over the last five years. We issued 36,658 humanitarian visas to people from Afghanistan, the second country on the list.

100,000
An extremely conservative estimate of the number of civilians killed in both the initial invasion and the ongoing battle against insurgents. There is no single source for this number, but most estimates range from 100,000 to 170,000.

Baghdad casualties
This blast in the first month of the war killed nine civilians. Image: supplied

600,000
The number of Iraqi civilians executed under Saddam Hussein's regime
 
Saddam poster
Burn in hell, murderer (AP Photo/Khalid Mohammed)

600,000
Quite coincidentally, this is the estimated number of ordinary Australians who marched against the Iraq War in marches across the country in February 2003. The marches were populated not just by your standard anti-war dreadlocked hippies, but by people from all walks of life who could see no logical reason to send young soldiers to their deaths.
 
No Iraq protest
In addition to the usual suspects, there were countless Mums and Dads. Pic: Andy Baker
 
Almost one trillion dollars
That's how much the war has cost the US government. That's one thousand billion, by the way, and it'll soar well over that when interest payments and other factors are taken into account.

......Reposted from Scott @ Bill In Exile - Never Forget Them....

"Because they’re still fighting, dying, being crippled for life and disfigured in our name."
.....reposted from Scott's blog....

..........and by OUR name - yes they are also fighting for Australia and Australians.......because terror doesn't care if you are American, Australian, civilian or military.... it simply wants to kill you because you will not bow down to it.....

...Never Forget Them.....

.

.....2 Combat.........So Some Marines Peed On A Dead Taliban.....

.................and yet I'm OK with it............. here's why.......

  1. The Taliban summarily execute homosexuals.
  2. The Taliban have killed Marines and then dragged their bodies through villages.
  3. The Taliban summarily execute women who have been raped. BEEN raped - not raped someone - raped BY someone....... they execute the victim.
  4. The Taliban sanction honor killings and honor attacks like throwing acid into the faces of women they believe they were scorned by.
  5. The Taliban beat young girls who they believe are immodestly dressed.
  6. The Taliban celebrated the 9/11 attacks. They participated in and assisted the funding of the attacks.
  7. The Taliban celebrated the 7/7 attacks in London.
  8. The Taliban celebrated the Bali Bombing in which 82 people died.
  9. The Taliban pose as simple villagers and gladly accept Marine aid including medical supplies, medical treatment and food - they then report the position of the Marines providing that aid, to their Taliban colleagues so they can lay IED's on the route they will take when they leave and kill the Marines who were just there helping them all.
So............ the world is outraged because four Marines - who have most likely lost many fellow Marines to these abhorrent excuses for individuals - decided to pee on a dead Taliban...Here's the vid being played on every news network in the world...

....Personally - I would have taken a dump on him.... Why? Because the Taliban are not people - they are evil - pure unadulterated evil. And if they want to bring it - they better be able to take it.

That/s my 2 Cents Worth and I'm sleeping fine tonight.

Shalom

D
.

......2 Happy... Stevens Says Bin Laden Killing Legal.....

......I don't care if it was legal or not - it is WAR - you kill the fuckers on the other side till they surrender - end of god-dammed-story..........

Justice Stevens says bin Laden killing legally justified

By Bill Mears, CNN Supreme Court Producer
May 13, 2011 6:14 p.m. EDT
Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens spoke of the bin Laden raid in remarks at Northwestern University.
Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens spoke of the bin Laden raid in remarks at Northwestern University.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • "I must say I was very proud of the SEALs," retired Justice Stevens says
  • "I haven't the slightest doubt it was entirely appropriate," he says
  • Stevens has been unusually outspoken for a retired justice

Washington (CNN) -- Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens has voiced support for the killing of al Qaeda terrorist leader Osama bin Laden by U.S. forces, saying it was legally justified.

In remarks Thursday evening at his alma mater, Northwestern University, the 91-year-old former justice said the order by President Barack Obama for the covert mission by U.S. Navy SEALs was "to remove an enemy who had been trying every day to attack the United States," according to two people who attended a symposium and dinner that was closed to the media.

Stevens said he was pleased the president took the risky decision to launch the May 2 commando assault on bin Laden's compound in Pakistan. The justice added, "I must say I was very proud of the SEALs."

No sitting member of the Supreme Court has commented on the bin Laden killing and is not likely to, since current or related executive branch issues may someday come before them.

There have been legal questions surrounding whether U.S. and international law would permit a unilateral executive decision to kill a terrorist leader with no ties to any government. Attorney General Eric Holder said the day after the mission, "It's lawful to target an enemy commander in the field."

As founder and head of al Qaeda, bin Laden was viewed by the administration as a combatant actively involved in past and current hostilities against the United States and other countries.

The insistence by Obama officials that the killing was justified come despite bin Laden not being armed when commandos stormed his third-floor room. Those officials insist the Saudi native "resisted" and made no clear indication he would surrender.

Stevens said based on his knowledge of the facts, "I haven't the slightest doubt it was entirely appropriate for American forces to act" as they did. "It was not merely to do justice and avenge September 11."

The Wall Street Journal Law Blog first reported Stevens' remarks.

He stepped down from the high court last year after nearly 35 years on the bench, and was replaced by Justice Elena Kagan.

Unusually for a retired justice, he has been outspoken on current hot-button cases his former colleagues are considering and on other news events. He voiced support in November for a planned Islamic community center near the site of the September 11 terrorist attacks in New York, urging religious and ethnic tolerance.

He announced this week he has almost completed writing a memoir of sorts, a look at the five chief justices he has known and worked with over the past 64 years. Called the "Five Chiefs," and to be published by Little Brown this October, the book will also give an inside look at the court and Stevens' personal insights on colleagues past and present, including current Chief Justice John Roberts.

Before retiring, Stevens had been a consistent supporter of limited rights for terror suspects in U.S. custody overseas to challenge their detention in federal courts. In the first terrorism case to arise in the high court from the 9/11 attacks, Stevens said foreign-born terror suspects captured abroad and held at a Navy-run prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, did have some basic rights.

"What is presently at stake is only whether the federal courts have jurisdiction to determine the legality of the executive's potentially indefinite detention of individuals who claim to be wholly innocent of wrongdoing," he wrote in 2004.

Stevens is a World War II veteran. He served as an intelligence officer in Hawaii, where his work included supervising the cracking of secret Japanese codes. He was speaking in public Friday to graduates at his old law school in Chicago, where he graduated in 1947 at the top of his class.

***article reprinted from CNN.com***

Support : Copyright © 2011. horney paper storms - All Rights Reserved
Proudly powered by Blogger